May 31, 2016

Think back to a special childhood moment when you were able to achieve a difficult goal.  Maybe you caught your first fish, successfully mastered a two-wheeler or baked your first batch of cookies. Thinking back to those moments, for many, something very special made that achievement possible. Since the beginning of time and observed in every culture in the world, is the Guided Participation Relationship (GPR). The GPR is the authentic collaboration between a more experienced “Guide” and a willing “Apprentice.”  The GPR provides the apprentice with an opportunity to learn and grow alongside a teaching guide who provides learning opportunities and an appropriate level of challenge to foster a growth-seeking mindset.  One core deficit of those affected by autism is the reduced ability to participate in, and to take advantage of, the GPR. For typically developing children and their parents, this relationship naturally develops and serves as the child’s main point of reference as they develop during their early years. A child affected by autism begins to withdraw from this rich and beneficial relationship around 9 months of age and thus suffers the loss of growth that takes place within this rich and essential relationship.

Research by Hobson et al. provides more information about how a child’s withdrawal from the GPR affects parental interactions and solidifies the child’s path down an atypical development trajectory. In a 2015 study, Hobson et al. set out to observe whether families participating in a Relationship Development Intervention (RDI®)  program were able to progress towards re-establishment of the GPR through the protocol set forth by the program founder, Dr. Steve Gutstein. Hobson et al. first studied differences between the interaction styles in typically developing versus atypically developing dyads and found that parental interactions in atypically developing GPR relationships were found to be more directive in nature, of lower quality and with a reduced capacity to co-regulate and share experiences. Hobson et al. found that children-parent dyads participating in the RDI® program experienced improvements in baseline ratings of parent-child interaction and that improvements in these ratings inversely correlated with Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) severity scores.

Though the initial loss of the GPR is a disappointing shock to parents, leaving many unsure of how to function as a guide for their disengaged child, the RDI® program systematically addresses core deficits and aims to reinstate the parental guide role. Dr. Gutstein calls RDI® “A second chance,” meaning that one main goal of the program is to re-establish the GPR, which in turn brings the child closer to a more typical development trajectory. There isn’t any person on earth more qualified, more consistent and more able to serve as a guide to your child than you. RDI® empowers parents, enabling them to restore their role and to enthusiastically guide their child through the challenges of life.

As you become more comfortable in your guiding role, you are more able to provide your child with those same sweet memories you enjoyed in childhood, including the proud feelings of accomplishment and the shared joy of a hard-earned victory.

-Amber Sobrio-Ritter

References:

Hobson, J. A., Tarver, L., Beurkens, N., & Hobson, R. P. (2015). The Relation between Severity of Autism and Caregiver-Child Interaction: a Study in the Context of Relationship Development Intervention. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 1-11